233 comments

Six Dumb Misconceptions About The Economy (that the Politicians Want You To Believe)

Well, it looks like we’re here in another US election year already. 

As Advanced Mustachians, we already know that the ongoing battle of Harris vs. Trump should not be consuming much of our time.  Sure, we do our research and cast our votes but after that we move right on to focus on other things within our own circle of control.

But out of all the things the politicians like to bicker about, there’s one area where MMM does need to set the record straight, and that area is of course money. Your money, the economy in general, and the overall wealth of the nation. 

Politicians are already not known for being the sharpest tools in the shed when it comes to technical stuff like science, technology, or economics. But this year the discourse has become particularly dumb, as our candidates try to manipulate undecided voters in swing states with ideas that are based on irrational emotions rather than sound economic sense. 

For one particularly funny example, you may have noticed that the competing party (Trump in this case) is attacking the incumbents (Biden/Harris) over the “bad economy.” When in fact the US economy is stronger than it has ever been, with the lowest unemployment we’ve ever seen as well. 

It’s hard to imagine a better situation than we have right now, and in fact the recent bout of higher inflation is a sign that things have been going too well, and we needed to step on the brakes with the help of higher interest rates

But somehow the people still seem to believe that we have a “bad” economy. Take a look at this Gallup poll showing that while most people (85%) are doing really well right now, they assume that it’s just their own good fortune – only 17% believe the economy is doing well. 

This is mathematically impossible, because if most people are doing well, that’s the definition of a good economy! And suspiciously enough, this widespread wrongness correlates quite nicely with the rise of social media misinformation.

So the politicians and the news have been doing the opposite of what they should be doing in an ideal situation (sharing accurate information). And sure, we can always just ignore their speeches and go on with our lives. But when it comes to economics, knowledge is power (and money). The more accurately we understand how things really work, the wealthier we will all become.

So with all that in mind, I hereby present you with my list of the… 

Top Dumb Things Politicians Want You To Believe About The Economy

1: The President Controls the Economy

If there’s a recession, the opposition party likes to blame it on the current president. If the economy is booming, the current president likes to give himself (or possibly soon herself) credit for all of that success. But really, the US economy is way too big – and thankfully way too free – for the president to control or really even influence all that strongly. 

In reality, our economy is a gigantic machine which converts labor and materials into things like iPhones, hospitals and pumpkin pies. And although we’re the biggest economy at 26% of the planet, we are still heavily influenced by that much bigger 74% of economic activity that the other 7.6 billion people on Earth are busy producing everywhere else.

When we have our inevitable little boom and bust cycles, they are mostly caused by the normal cycle of irrational exuberance (and greed) like the 2007 housing boom, followed by brief periods of extreme fear and pessimism like the 2008-2012 financial and housing crash. 

The government does play a role too, by setting tax rates and other rules. But the effects of these policies are usually so delayed and unpredictable, that you can’t draw a straight line between today’s president and today’s economy. In other words, the government does its best to adjust the rudder on our giant ship, but in the short term our economy lurches around on the waves and storms of the ocean.

2: The President Controls Interest Rates

This one is especially funny to me, as our candidates feign sympathy for the hard life of middle class Americans, who now face higher borrowing costs on their credit cards and car loans and mortgages. They claim they will fight to bring the interest rates down. Trump even goes as far as bullying our Federal Reserve board members (who can only do their jobs if we allow them to function as independent experts) and suggesting that he would take over the whole department, if elected.

The real story is that while monetary policy would be a terrible tool to leave in the hands of a sitting president (see Argentina), it does function as an excellent set of gas and brake pedals for the economy if used properly. When things slow down and unemployment gets too high, a cut to the interest rates will produce a boost in everything from new jobs to stock prices. But if things get too hot, you get rapid inflation which can mess up the system.

3: Inflation has Made Life Harder for Americans (and the President Can Magically Reverse it)

This line of reasoning is even dumber than the last one. For a couple of years after the Covid era, we had rapid inflation. It was caused by a rare combination of a goods shortage caused by things like factory closures and remote work, plentiful demand from government stimulus spending and low interest rates. These factors have since ironed themselves out, and inflation is back down to an ultra-low 2.4%.

Steve Ballmer explains the inflation vs wages debate in his useful new video series called USA Facts (see note below)

But most significantly, wages have still risen faster than inflation so we are all better off than before! Since 2019, overall prices are up 19% and our wages are up 21%. So even after all that inflation, we are still doing just fine. But the candidates are still bickering over inflation as if it’s an actual problem, and even worse promising to “bring prices back down”. And they’ve managed to convince the electorate that “higher wages and prices” is the same thing as “a bad economy”. Which is just plain wrong.

Bonus dumbness: politicians also occasionally blame “greedy corporations” for increasing prices to hoard profits. While price increases are totally acceptable in a market system (as a business owner you are free to set prices wherever you like), in reality it doesn’t usually happen because our markets are too competitive. For example, a recent deep analysis from NPR showed that no, grocery stores haven’t made any windfall profit at all off of this recent bout of Covid-fueled inflation.

4: The President Controls Housing Prices

One important thing that has changed over the past ten years is that US house prices and rents have both risen much faster than general inflation and even wages. On the positive side, interest rates have also risen which tends to make houses feel more expensive and is supposed to help bring house prices down. But it hasn’t happened yet which means we have the double whammy of higher prices and higher interest costs for mortgage borrowers. 

The dumb part is that our candidates are proposing things that would make the problem even worse, like subsidies for first-time homebuyers or schemes to reduce the interest rates. When really the solution is to increase the supply of housing, which I personally think will happen if we stop putting up roadblocks for homebuilders (myself included) to build housing. 

Things like faster and cheaper permits, less onerous and expensive building codes, eliminating suburban-style zoning and setback and car parking rules, and changing laws so that NIMBYs no longer get any say over what other people do with their own land could all help reduce the cost of building a house by about 50%, quickly and permanently.

5: The President Controls Gas Prices, and They Are Currently “High” and We Want Them Lower

Ahh, gasoline! The most ridiculous of things to worry about and the fuel for many of MMM’s rants since 2011. 

First of all, on an inflation-adjusted basis, gasoline is still about the same price as it was in 1950: in the $3-4 range per gallon, in today’s dollars. 

Secondly, it is so cheap that even with our huge inefficient American vehicles, the average household is still only spending 2.5% of their disposable income on the stuff! (The funny part is that they spend many times more on the rest of the car ownership experience while thinking gas is the part that is expensive)

Third, gasoline has been obsolete for almost a decade now. You can get a used electric car for less than the price of a comparable used gas car, or if you’re a fancypants money waster like me, new EVs are also cheaper than their gas counterparts. You get a faster, nicer car that almost never needs maintenance OR gasoline, and save money.

So why are we even still talking about this antique fuel of a previous era? Why aren’t the candidates also arguing over the price of Kodak film or typewriters or fax machines?

6: The Economy is Something We Should Even Worry About

The funniest part about all this economic talk is that we’re focusing on the wrong thing. While hard work and business and advancing the frontiers of human knowledge are all fun things, the reality is that we passed the point of having “Enough” decades ago. When the American middle class complains about how hard we have it these days, it’s like a bunch of overfed people at a buffet wishing they could just have one more flavor of donuts stacked onto the table.

Yes, we have income and wealth inequality so that the rich tend to get richer more quickly. And yes, we should keep that in check with a somewhat progressive tax system because a more equal society tends to be a more peaceful and happy one. 

But have you noticed that as the rich people get richer, they don’t get any happier? It’s because after you pass the point of “Enough”, adding more money doesn’t really help much. 

And “Enough” is much more defined by your mindset (and your collection of life skills) than your paycheck. So if the politicians really cared about improving our happiness and wellbeing, they’d be preaching the Principles of Mustachianism rather than pandering to the specific requests of coal miners or billionaires.

But alas, winning an election is a very different thing than proposing stuff that is actually best for the country. And for that reason, we cast our votes for the best party and then tune back out until the next election.

Happy voting!

In the Comments: Has the election season been getting you down, pumping you up, or just giving you a thorough dose of “Meh”?

Further Reading/Watching: 

While researching economic stats for this article, I came across a quirky but informative series of videos called USA Facts by none other than former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. It seems that he had the same frustration as me: Americans are fighting over a bunch of opinions and misinformation without even bothering to look up the actual facts. So he made a well-produced series of videos that just share the facts without the baggage of political hype on top of them. I wish our politicians could do the same thing!

Bonus Podcast based on this article!
Thanks to the magic of AI, you can direct the wizardry within Google to generate a custom-made podcast on almost anything on the Internet. A reader just emailed me this take on this episode – remarkably human-like and even entertaining!
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/0e1d0af8-8888-466c-abe4-8b1da8986773/audio

  • Tasse October 15, 2024, 1:56 pm

    Voting isn’t the only thing in your circle of control! Working a polling place, volunteering for a local candidate, or writing letters to encourage voter turnout (https://votefwd.org/) are all great ways to actually HELP SOLVE PROBLEMS rather than just whining about them!

    Reply
  • Marie Gordon October 15, 2024, 3:23 pm

    There is no mention of healthcare here. Mine doubled in cost in an employer sponsored plan (HDHP of course, and salad, barbell, bike), plus the benefits shifted from coverage for ED to 20/80 cost share.
    Is healthcare part of the CPI?
    Definitely worse than 2019 for me.

    There is also insurance home and car which also increased sharply and I doubt will decline in price next year.
    For many families this represents several grand of necessary expenditure.

    Reply
    • dandarc October 28, 2024, 3:23 pm

      This seems like something to take up with your employer. Unless you’re hoping for single-payer, which while would be a great improvement is not a thing that’s likely to happen in the near term.

      Reply
  • Gary Grewal October 16, 2024, 12:05 pm

    A very thoughtful and timely post. I hope your message reaches more people and they can be educated and not just focus on the powers they think the president has!

    Agree on costs of gas, many electric cars are much cheaper now, even more so than gas cars, yet some people “need” a gas car or a truck.

    On housing, I agree that supply needs to be increased, but what about restrictions on corporations and overseas investors buying up homes? What about the amount of homes that sit empty most of the time as vacation homes or those that sit as AirBnBs? I know some cities have restrictions, but it seems in California at least, a new development of homes is quickly bought up, but some rarely have the lights on and the yard is overgrown.

    I love and agree with this 110%: Things like faster and cheaper permits, less onerous and expensive building codes, eliminating suburban-style zoning and setback and car parking rules, and changing laws so that NIMBYs no longer get any say over what other people do with their own land could all help reduce the cost of building a house by about 50%, quickly and permanently.

    Reply
  • Jim Van Cura October 16, 2024, 12:09 pm

    MMM, you forgot one…. No tax on tips. That new roof will cost you $100 with a mandatory $20,000 gratuity. This one is too easy to game, too difficult and expensive to enforce, and will make the wealthy more wealthy by driving down wages increasing their profits while the poor who work for tips will lose out on real wages and benefits, which would also negatively impact their Social Security benefit as they would show no earnings come retirement.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache October 18, 2024, 7:53 am

      Yeah, I must admit that while I try to stay tuned out of the shit the candidates throw around on the campaign trail (because most of it never makes it into law), I did hear about that one. And I disagree with it. In fact, tips shouldn’t even exist at the big scale they do now!

      I’d rather just have a reasonable minimum wage that keeps up with inflation – for example the regional experiments with $15 minimum wages seem to have gone pretty well and I think we should try it out on a bigger scale (https://www.cbo.gov/publication/55681).

      But as a business owner who sometimes has employees, I think we should also make it WAY EASIER TO HIRE AND PAY PEOPLE! Right now, there are insane bullshit rules about payroll deductions, medicare, pension, worker’s comp, unemployment and so on where you have to thread this needle of very powerful and angry organizations who will FINE YOU if you don’t do all the paperwork perfectly.

      And then they go after employers who rightfully want to just pay people as contractors in order to avoid all this nonsense!

      Just stop it. Any person should be able to give money to another person for work performed, and it needs to be frictionless. If that means creating a national payroll deductions system where they handle all their own complicated shit in the background, so be it. But for me as the employer it needs to be as simple as saying “Joe did $1000 of work for me this week so here’s his thousand bucks.” Then I click submit and it’s done.

      Reply
      • April October 22, 2024, 7:54 am

        MMM, welcome to the over regulated world. Not to say some places require layers after layers of references (especially in healthcare and academia where direct supervisors’ letters are required, and good luck to those with the asshole boss!). You do your work, you get paid. But when the G and the Lawyers get in the way, anything becomes additional processes to generate revenues, only not for the people directly involved. And I don’t think any candidate could change that.

        Reply
  • MrColton October 16, 2024, 1:32 pm

    I have to say I really miss the old MMM who wasn’t afraid to really weigh in on politics. MMM of old used to talk firmly about higher taxes, funding education, and a societal focus on addressing climate change. Old MMM articles have a nearly full throated endorsement of Obama policies and reasons for why. Even if I disagreed on certain pointsI appreciate someone who believes in something much more than someone who fence sits. These days it’s just “stop worrying about politics, whatever happens happens!” The apathy and hand waving support for the status quo (which includes blasting past the 2.0C “upper barrier” for climate change before it goes catastrophic at exponential speeds) just feels hollow. One party is investing in renewables (though not enough), one is threatening to tariff imported solar and “drill baby drill”. It’s sad that this is no longer something MMM seems to care about. I haven’t seen him mention climate change, education, or making a better world for our children then the one we have now in a while. It’s just “my stocks are up, stop complaining everyone else!”.

    The second thing is that if the economy feels bad but actually isn’t the solution can’t just be “just get over it!”. Telling people to get over it has never worked. If people are feeling bad there has to be something to it and it has to be addressed. I think there are things that are more and less legitimate here that are making people feel bad about the economy.

    Some legitimate things. The absolute essentials: food, healthcare, education, child care, home maintenance, and more have all seen inflation higher than the base rate and higher than wages. This in particular affects lower earners and responsible mustachians, who spend a higher portion of their income on essentials. Yes, enormous flatscreen TVs only cost a few hundred dollars now, and that’s cool and all, but that basically drags the CPI down while essential costs go up. Anxiety about climate change is real and deserved. 12 years ago when MMM wrote about how markets were solving climate change I felt very inspired. I felt very optimistic.

    But now we release more CO2 every year than the last. Fusion is still 20 years away. Attempts to eliminate single family zoning have mostly failed. We’re getting double hurricanes in October and it is clear we need to care more about climate not less. This has an effect on people, even if they are locked in a 2.8% mortgage and save 50% of their income. Raising children knowing that temperatures are increasing exponentially is really fucking scary. Women and Doctors have lost rights. If you live in certain states you can be charged with a crime unless you carry your rapist’s baby to term. Can we pause and just think about that? Can we move past all the “everything is always getting better” rhetoric and take note of the fact that, factually, objectively, in our first world super-giga-economy women are being forced to give birth to already dead fetuses and dying from it?

    There’s plenty of irrationality that needs to be corrected as well. Keeping up with the Joneses has reached staggering levels of insanity on the Gen Z internet. Everyone follows someone who pretends to have a private jet and then goes into CC debt to buy Ballenciaga because the influencer told them it would make them appear more serious and the raise they got would make up for it. People buying crypto meme stocks instead of VT because they saw a tiktok that said SHIB was going to the moon. Yeah, these are people hurting themselves. But if people are systematically hurting themselves we need systematic solutions. Support for personal finance in public education, especially in disadvantaged zip codes where they are unlikely to get that from their home life. More funding for public education in general. We need policy to suppress the cost of college which has become outrageous.

    One of the parties is openly trying to gut public education, ban books, force religious “teaching”. Our very own MMM owes much of his blessings to a state subsidized public university education in Canada. In the past he championed this model and talked about how weird and crazy education costs were here. It seems like this is lost on him now. Is this a case of “F you I got mine?”

    I really want to drive this home: systematic anxiety and insecurity can’t be solved by just telling people to feel better. There has to be a source, rational or irrational, and it needs to be addressed.

    And I’ll add that I’m not some crybaby in credit card debt trying to blame others for my problems. I’m a mustachian with an ultra high savings rate, frugal grocery bills, no cable TV, a healthy amount of stocks, etc. I could FIRE now if I wanted to. But it’s important to look outside the bubble and see how people really live. Read the stories and meet the people buying fish antibiotics because they can’t afford real ones because their deductible is $18,000 and they make $20,000. Read the stories of corporate landlords ignoring mold that is making people sick and the tenants being unable to find any other place to live because everything else would cost 60% of their income. Software engineers, who make up so much of this FIRE movement, have never been more precarious. Lots of people in my network, great engineers, can’t get a call back from a single position they apply to.

    I agree this election is a shitshow, but let’s stop acting like everything is perfect and everyone should just shut up and ignore what’s happening.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache October 18, 2024, 7:40 am

      Man, there’s a lot in there Colton! I appreciate the call-out and don’t worry my values and reasons for writing this blog are still the same as ever. And I’ll be coming back to your blog-post-comment for some ideas for upcoming blog posts!

      Some of your points I would still label as complainypants and I would like to see some links and citations along with some of those claims.

      We don’t need FUSION to solve our energy needs for example – solar and storage are now here and cheaper than fusion was ever forecast to be and they have already solved the energy crisis – it’s just a permitting issue to get all the abundance hooked up to the grid, but check back in five years and let’s discuss the graph.

      But I’ll always choose optimism when it comes to my writing perspective. And in the case of this blog post – I felt that misinformation on the economy was one of the barriers to helping people make accurate choices in their votes. So I’m optimistic that a focus on stats will be helpful yet again in this election.

      Reply
      • THorton October 22, 2024, 7:35 am

        MMM Please bring back more posts shitting on cars & in particular the idiocy of ICE cars. Drilling oil with expensive equipment that often can leak into and destroy the local environment. Burning some of that oil to refine that oil, burning more oil to transport the refined oil. Relying on the mercy of international cartel organizations like OPEC to move the price of oil. All so that you can convert at most 40% of that oil into usable energy that propels a vehicle, while the rest is burned off as heat. Fueling these idiotic contraptions with oil still costs 2-10x as much as electricity for charging EV’s, and the grid charging these EV’s gets cleaner every day.

        Reply
  • JackOnRocks October 16, 2024, 2:47 pm

    Honest question: Why do you think so many people think the economy is not doing well? Do you think those people are just misinformed about the money they have and money that they’re spending? What do you think is convincing these people that the economy is not doing well? Inflation feels way different at the bottom than it does at the top or in the middle.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache October 18, 2024, 7:31 am

      That is a really good question. It’s super weird to me, because when I want to judge anything in a country, I don’t look at my personal situation or that of my friends. I look at the stats from the census bureau and the department of labor and so on!

      Just like when I’m trying to learn about health or science or heck even what are the most reliable cars, I’m not going to walk into the local tavern and see what’s the word on the street. I’m going to go to the library or the online equivalent thereof and read up on that shit!

      So, the situation we’re in now where our populace is not all that well informed of reality isn’t anything new. There have always been news bubbles and misinformation bubbles. But I do think it’s getting a bit worse now – the TV news (which is a business rather than a public service) keeps pushing the boundaries of sensationalism in order to fight for ratings. Politicians (Trump is notable for taking this to a whole new level) have realized that you can just make shit up and their followers don’t bother to fact check at all. And social media has allowed dumb stuff to spread with even lower journalistic standards.

      Reply
  • Bryan October 17, 2024, 4:21 am

    So glad I earned my Mustachian PhD years ago that all of this is second nature to me. Rock on MMM!

    Reply
  • Ben Dotzel October 17, 2024, 5:18 pm

    Once again, MMM cuts through the noise with his usual clarity. While I don’t agree with every point in his analysis, he’s absolutely nailed the big picture, as always. Mark my words—check back on this in four years, and you’ll see what I mean. For context, just take a look at his takes on the COVID frenzy (https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2020/03/03/coronavirus-stock-market/) or inflation (https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2022/01/11/inflation-should-we-be-worried/). The key takeaways are simple: don’t panic, focus on what you can control (a nod to ‘The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People’), and prioritize educating yourself rather than parroting other people’s opinions. Speaking of opinions, it seems The Economist feels that ‘ America’s economy is bigger and better than ever’. To the moon, USA! 😊”

    Reply
  • Mick October 18, 2024, 6:22 am

    Thanks for the reminder that I should devote less brain bandwidth to following the election. Amen to that!
    One serious quibble: while I agree that increasing housing supply by easing regulation makes some sense, I question the libertarian zeal I sense in promoting the claim that “changing laws so that NIMBYs no longer get any say over what other people do with their own land could all help reduce the cost of building a house by about 50%, quickly and permanently.”
    Really, property owners should get complete say over what they do with their property?
    So, MMM, if I own the land next to your beautiful park side home and want to build a cement factory there that will operate 24/7, generating noise and noxious dust, are you ok with that? By your reasoning, you have to be.
    But I sure as hell want some zoning that protects me from that.
    Thoughts?

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache October 18, 2024, 7:19 am

      Yeah, I admit that my rants on housing can lose some nuance sometimes because I’ve seen SUCH STUPID SHIT like my own city council blocking one really great development after another, even when they actually *want* more housing, just because the rules are so ridiculous!

      What I’d really do is have super strict rules only on externalities – like noise and pollution. And I’d also gradually fix the roads so there’s no such thing as traffic noise or pollution from obsolete gas cars as well. Car traffic jams are fine however – as long as they are on small roads and we have alternative ways to get around that aren’t personal cars. Like kickass bike paths and lanes!

      But the current rules on zoning where some cities aren’t even letting people use their own house for Airbnb income? Fuck that. And I should also be able to tear down a house on a big suburban lot and make it into a duplex or 4-plex or whatever.

      And if you want control over the lots around you, you can have that too – you can work hard, spend less, save and invest, and BUY THEM!

      Reply
  • Figuy October 18, 2024, 8:38 am

    Home ownership rates haven’t budged despite the higher prices.
    Sure the high prices/interest rates are frustrating for the very small minority of people looking to buy a home right now, but for everyone else, getting a huge discount when rates dropped to 2% was wonderful.

    People that are looking for homes are adapting to the situation, maybe getting slightly smaller houses/yards than the oversized ones that their parents bought in the last 40 years which I would argue is a good thing.

    Anecdotally, two young growing families I know gave up their large car centric newer home with 2% mortgage to DOWNSIZE to our mustachian friendly walkable tightknit neighborhood.

    Reply
  • PG October 19, 2024, 7:44 am

    In general, I think we should value science, and I’m trained as a scientist. I just want people to not use the word “science” like it is the absolute truth. Science is an approximation of reality or nature based on models and experiments and on how we analyze and interpret the data from them. Models and experiments are not perfect and sometimes our interpretations of the data (even if the data are correct) can be wrong. So, science is continuously being perfected with new theories, models, and interpretations. I often see now when people use the words scientific or science-based, they use them to shut down discussions. “It’s based on science, so you have to accept my viewpoint.” What if your “science” is selectively choosing what models, studies, data, and interpretations to consider. What if that selection is politically or financially motivated? These are the things we should consider when debating “science.”

    Reply
  • TrueNorth October 19, 2024, 10:15 am

    Just stumbled on USAFacts last night. Such a welcome and timely resource for those of us sifting through all the garbage online. It skew slightly left, which you can see in the videos they share (but not in the facts shared though). Another great resource I have appreciated lately is AllSides.com, which gives you details on news articles from both sides. So appreciate the work they do!

    Most important things we can do: control what we can control, save more than we spend, help things go right by making ourselves useful to our friends, families, and community. When watching all the politics within the US and internationally, just remember, people follow incentives, not advice.

    Reply
  • samanil October 19, 2024, 10:53 pm

    Informative and succinct article! I’d love to hear more of your thoughts on how the supply of housing could be increased. It seems like there’s a glut of so many things (phones, twinkies) while there just isn’t enough housing. What gives? maybe an article idea?

    Reply
  • Jon October 20, 2024, 5:51 am

    Hey MMM! Long time reader, love the article and always interested in learning how to focus my energy on the things that matter (AKA not politics).

    However, I was surprised that you, Mr. “Muscle over Motor”, is using AI art and promoting an AI-voice version of your article. Creativity is a muscle too, and I’m sure there are tons of super-talented artists and narrators in your community who would be happy to work for you! Even discounting the possible issues of art theft, voice misappropriation, and overwhelming energy usage that comes with AI, I would have thought you weren’t the type to take the “easy” way just because it was there.

    Reply
    • Mick October 21, 2024, 5:11 am

      “Creativity is a muscle, too”. So true!

      Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache October 21, 2024, 1:04 pm

      Haha, my son just won a gentleman’s bet because of you! (As a musician and artist himself, he warned me that there is a small but vocal community out there that are highly opposed to the use of Generative AI as a tool, even for a fellow creative like myself who just happens to be a writer)

      I appreciate the thought and I’m definitely keeping an eye on the development of this amazing technology, but I’m also against the scarcity mentality rejection of new things just because they shake up the way things currently are.

      Throughout history there have been strong objections to things like steam engines, conveyor belts, robots, computers, automated bank teller machines, and the Internet.

      AI is just the latest of those things, and while you can say “it’s different this time” because there has never been anything that can compete with the logic and creativity of Human brain until now, the truth is that nobody knows. I personally think everything is an experiment, especially a new form of intelligence that we get to increase our own joy and productivity.

      That Eagle with glasses gives me a good laugh, as does the fake podcast discussing this article. I think it’s not only harmless, but beneficial for MMM readers to be exposed to stuff like this (as well as other places) since that is the way the world is headed. Best to be aware of what’s out there and let it inform your living and investing decisions.

      p.s. When I wrote that Muscle over Motor article I was thinking more about physical activity and health, but I still really appreciate references to campy old MMM Classics, and applying them to new situations!

      Reply
  • Ed Grozalis October 20, 2024, 8:50 am

    Thanks for the logical, concise, unbiased article.
    Please write more often!

    Reply
  • Renee October 21, 2024, 9:54 am

    Thank you MMM! You should be on Fox and every other news media outlet shouting this from the rooftops!

    Reply
  • April October 22, 2024, 8:28 am

    Another reason why people are so dissatisfied and mad at others is that they don’t feel safe around people holding different views, especially when the people holding different views are generalized and dehumanized as a group not as individuals. As a woman of color, when I see my group of people and country of origin is blatantly targeted, and so many others resonate with those vile views, it feels scary. That is a sentiment that MMM and a lot of his followers are unlikely to experience. However, in my community, when I actually talk to my neighbors who hold signs of both sides, they appear to be fellow human beings who share similar joys, sorrows, complaints and etc. Humanity is what we share but usually placed at the bottom of the list when we are stuffed with the information from different media. That is a paradox because most FIRE people benefit from index funds heavy on tech stocks, and the tech stocks increase so much in the last 15 to 20 years by making people more polarized using algorithms to feed things they want to hear and see.

    Reply
  • Bill Karoshi October 22, 2024, 8:26 pm

    Another Great article.
    I have found that people that don’t understand the Economy also have a bad personal economy.

    Reply
  • Wade October 23, 2024, 1:06 pm

    If I’ve learned anything, come election result day, it won’t really matter who wins. The Uniparty will continue piling up unlimited debt.

    Maybe it won’t matter, maybe it will matter. It is outside the scope of my control. Even with a vote, it is a drip in the ocean.

    Do the right things, save up a pile. Buy less stuff and things. Control spending and right size your house and car spending.

    Gnashing of teeth over either side winning or losing is wasted enamel.

    Reply
  • Dan G October 24, 2024, 10:44 am

    MMM
    I am a longtime reader of your blog and appreciate the knowledge that you share. This article goes right into the heart of one of my favorite topics – how little the president can impact the economy and how productivity and business are more impacted by technology, business cycles etc than politics.
    I do want to point out something about inflation though. While most things in this article are true in a ‘general’ sense, Economics being a statistical discipline rather than a hard science, you ought to mention that the tails do NOT follow the same rules as the average. So while most of the times government spending or ‘printing of dollars’ is fine, when done to extreme and especially fast, the usual rules will break down. This is especially true because the unit used to measure the economy is also the USD. When you have reducing amount of goods and services (due to Covid) measured in a hugely increased amount of dollars, the price of those goods and services will be higher, and that is inflation. That’s what people saw in higher prices, and that is a correct observation. Here the economy has NOT actually improved – we don’t have more goods and services – we just changed the numbers on the price tags. If we had the exact same amount of goods and services produced but they were worth 2 trillion dollars instead of 1 trillion dollars, would you say the economy is doing better?
    May be GDP in PPP could tell us a better picture, but I am not really sure. Would love to hear your take on it.

    Thanks,
    Dan

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache October 24, 2024, 8:56 pm

      Hey Dan,

      I think we agree – the Covid era was indeed inflationary because of more dollars chasing fewer goods. There was inflation, but there was ALSO a temporary spike of much higher profits for the companies offering the things in short supply (for example US-based automakers).

      But shortly thereafter, not only did the trade routes reopen but the higher profits triggered higher production of everything. This is what got the inflation rate down so quickly and why some categories are now seeing *deflation* which may continue for a while (hopefully in housing but I know that’s kind of a chronic shortage!)

      Also, as the economy sprung back from the Coronacrash, there was also an increasing shortage of workers, which is why wages have risen even faster than inflation.

      As I stated in the article, the net effect after all of these events is something like 19% higher prices and 21% higher average wages. Also, substantially higher real GDP, productivity, and employment levels.

      As a side note, I’ve been surprised by the number of comments coming in saying, “This article is BUNK! MY wages only went up 3% in the past year and my utility prices doubled! You’re being GASLIGHTED MMM!!! ”

      This is so far off from the point that I almost just tossed my keyboard into the trash and gave up writing altogether.

      Because, once again, when we’re judging the economy or any other situation we DO NOT JUST LOOK AT OUR OWN PERSONAL SITUATION OR THAT OF OUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS!!! Big data and national spreadsheets that show DECADES of data are your friend – only with that perspective can you really understand what’s going on in the world.

      And once you understand the world better, you can make wiser and less emotion-based decisions, which means more wealth and a more peaceful life.

      Reply
  • Katie October 24, 2024, 10:16 pm

    I think this just goes to show that when it comes to economics, perception is reality and the vibecession mentality has a vice grip on many. Politicians know this and use it to their advantage.

    Reply
  • Jon October 25, 2024, 2:58 pm

    The wonderful yester years when we didn’t have to have politics in every facet of our lives. It would be nice if we could shrink the government down to the point where not everyone has to feel like they have comment on it.

    Reply
  • Todd October 26, 2024, 12:44 pm

    Normally I’d agree, but in this election one candidate wants to give us a wealth tax, taking unrealized cap gains on “billionaires” (in lefty math, that means households worth $100mm). It would force sales of stock and crash the market, and ultimately like all such taxes it will hit the middle class through inflation (they’re never indexed) and policy changes. Harris’s own endorser Mark Cuban called it an “economy destroyer,” and he’s right.

    Reply
    • dandarc October 28, 2024, 3:30 pm

      And the other wants to impose massive tariffs, which will create a lot of that terrible inflation the right pretends to care about.

      Reply
  • Debbie October 27, 2024, 6:15 pm

    Maybe its not your wheel house, MMM, but I would love to see an article on international monetary policy – tariffs, national debt, effects of war, currency values. Or I would love some unbiased (or at least less biased!) readable resources in understanding these.

    Reply
  • Joe November 1, 2024, 12:49 pm

    “So if the politicians really cared about improving our happiness and wellbeing, they’d be preaching the Principles of Mustachianism rather than pandering to the specific requests of coal miners or billionaires.”

    The first politician to propose mustachianism would probably lose by a landslide. But I’d vote for them regardless of party.

    Also, has any politician advocated for anything similar to mustachianism?

    Reply
  • ES November 3, 2024, 8:08 pm

    Dear MMM,

    This is a check-in update exactly 10 years after I found your blog. I read every article that existed in October 2014, and in November 2014 I started putting your theories into effect. I opened my Vanguard brokerage account that month and put $700 in VTI. Today, after consistent relatively small deposits, it has $190,000. I consolidated accounts, moved everything to Vanguard, tracked down and rolled over all the random 401(k)s we had lingering from jobs in our 20s. We paid $8000 cash for a 2009 Subaru Outback that we’re still driving today. (We live in a city and only use it for road trips in the summer.) My family of 4 commutes by bicycle, walking and public transportation (train, ferry, tram). We order bulk ingredients and cook from scratch. We’ve never had a TV and spend our evenings reading or playing games. Over the last decade we’ve had high earning years and low earning years (including 2 years during the pandemic when one salary disappeared and our income fell by 75%). Through it all, our lifestyle didn’t change and we kept saving for retirement and college tuitions. We hang out, play tennis on the free courts, go hiking, read library books, cook, eat, work out, meet friends. We just added up our net worth and it went from roughly $400,000 in 2014 to $3.09 million today. I never thought I’d see a number like that in my entire life, and we’re just getting started!

    So thanks, MMM. Your theories work, they are empowering and give me great peace of mind knowing that my family and financial situation are stable in these uncertain times. And our now-teenage kids have learned Mustachianism also, so they know how to treat money as a tool that can help build their lives and enrich the lives of others. They’ll never be slaves to it and, like us, will always have enough – which is the greatest gift imaginable. Thanks again.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 4, 2024, 7:03 am

      WOW! Best story ever! Thanks so much for sharing it ES and all of my biggest congratulations on living such a good life with your family.

      I hope you keep enjoying your wealth and feel abundant about things (frugal but not cheap) for the rest of your life. Rock on!

      Reply
  • rhyolite November 7, 2024, 7:06 am

    When inequality just gets worse and worse as it has over the last fifty years, people just won’t listen to your rational arguments. Inequality creates fear and loathing, no matter how rich the collective society. People feel this inequality, and their feelings are real and valid, even if they also hold many irrational beliefs. Inequality is the problem, and real progressive taxation is the solution (and reinvestment in education, health, quality of life for all, etc.) Unfortunately, as much as I do like free markets in the abstract, now that corporations and their billionaire owners have amassed so much relative power, they will defeat all efforts to create a less unequal society. Unrestrained capital has gone too far.

    Reply
  • rhyolite November 7, 2024, 7:17 am

    I mean, I think your philosophy has worked wonders for me personally, and could improve the lives of anybody who tries them, but you’re just not going to convince most people when inequality is so high and divisive.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 7, 2024, 4:53 pm

      You’ve got an interesting point here, and I’ve been thinking of trying to write an article about it for a long time. I’ve read lots about how wealth/income inequality is a big problem for humans, although I always been mystified because I don’t feel it myself. Even when I had zero net worth in my teens and early twenties, I didn’t feel a single bit of jealously or resentment towards billionaires, for example. I’m just super happy that I live in a place where incomes are relatively high relative to the price of food and other necessities.

      Comparison is the enemy of happiness! (even though I’m all for more equality too if it ends up making everyone happier)

      Reply
  • Jiby Mathew November 7, 2024, 12:49 pm

    Hi MMM, A long time reader of your articles, just wanted to thank you for all your hard work to enlighten who ever that is trying to get enlightened financially and environmentally. Keep on writing. I love waiting for your posts, but wish the wait was shorter.
    Surrey, Canada

    Reply
  • David November 10, 2024, 8:21 pm

    The thing about interest rates is that to potential buyers they’re actually irrelevant (or higher is better*). while it might seem that a higher interest rate makes buying a house more expensive because they fluctuate for everyone together, at least from the effect of the federal reserve setting the prime rate, that means that asking prices and bids are also dependent on the interest rate. That’s why sellers like low rates! because buyers can, and if there is competition in bidding they MUST bid more. but if you’ll notice what is constant is your income at the time you’re bidding, which determines the monthly payment you can afford. and since the loan lengths are also rather constant, that means no matter the interest rate you’ll be paying the same monthly payment over the same 30 years.

    * the only wrinkle in this is if you refinance. which only makes sense to go from a higher rate to a lower rate, so the ideal strategy would be to buy when rates are high and thus bids and asks are lower locking in a lower purchase price and then when the rate drops to near zero rates (which everyone now thinks is supposed to be normal) you refinance to a lower interest loan. you can’t do that if you wait for low interest rates to buy.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 11, 2024, 10:38 am

      You’d think so if people behaved rationally. But based on the rise of the average monthly mortgage payment (it’s about double now versus 2019), it looks like people just stretch further to buy houses.

      Once you reach the absolute limit of what people will qualify for, then yes a certain category of average housing might top out and truly be controlled by interest rates. But this is a terrible way to run a housing market! Ideally the product should be plentiful and thus competitively priced so that the prices sink down to roughly the cost of construction + raw land. And in the cheaper areas of the US, this is still how the prices work (a 2000 SF suburban house still costs only about $300k to build in low cost areas with the builder-basic finishes, and a further $50k of higher quality will get you a place that’s genuinely nice)

      Reply
  • Daniel Savard November 13, 2024, 10:15 am

    Hello MMM,
    long time reader of your blog-still love it!
    Now that the election is over I have a few questions for you and would love to know what you think about this.
    Trump has autocratic tendencies (to say the least). And now Musk is basically a co-president of the USA. Are you concerned about this? In the event that democracy, which is already fragile, is replaced by Trump and the Oligarchy, can we expect stock returns in the future to be as good as they were in the past? Do you know exemples of non democratic countries with good stock market returns in the long run? If you were worried about democracy dying, where would you invest your money then?
    The more I think about it, the more I doubt total and free misinformation and democracy can co-exist. We can not agree with each other in a democracy if we all have a different views about facts and what is real or not. The economy is a good example. Facts say it is good now, but a huge part of the electorate ‘feel’ it is not good…and therefore are angry and voted for Republicans because of that. Would appreciate your views when you have a moment.
    Thanks and keep-up the good work!

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 13, 2024, 2:42 pm

      I think a good way to think about this is to time travel back to 2016, the first time Trump got elected. At the time, many of the economists and business CEOs were pretty spooked because he was a wild card – his rants were back and forth on every issue so it was hard to tell what would really happy under his administration.

      As it turned out, the results were pretty similar to what I am suggesting in this article: some business sectors probably received a mild boost, others were slightly suppressed, and in the end we came out a richer country.

      This time, it sounds like they are proposing some more dramatic changes (I’m not a fan of protectionism and heavy tariffs for example), and it will be rather interesting to see what influence Elon has (my guess is lots of deregulation in the areas that benefit his companies such as autonomous driving and rocket launches). But I’ll reserve judgement on whether democracy is really in trouble until the next few elections. The USA has a tendency to wander off of the wise path but then find its way back eventually.

      Reply
      • Daniel Savard November 16, 2024, 8:35 am

        Thanks for your answer. I really doubt this time around will be similar to 2016 but I certainly hope so. The guardrails are gone, a lot of toxic people in power now all circling around Trump. Narcissist psychopaths are not recognized for controlling their worst impulses… these people will do anything to keep power, including crimes, especially if nobody can punish them for it.

        You should read this book from Giuliano Da Empoli: The Engineers of Chaos. It will help you understand what is going on with the information war that we are living through. It does explain a lot of what happened in the world in the last few years.

        Totally agree with your statement about the USA, hopefully the USA will find back the right path. Crossing my fingers it does not take to much time though…

        Reply
  • Kacy Wallace November 15, 2024, 6:17 pm

    Reply
  • Joel November 15, 2024, 8:44 pm

    Hello Grandfather Mustache

    We started reading about you around a decade ago. We we’re already lining up debt to pay off the highest rates first. Got a couple rental houses. Continued to push ourselves in our careers. Before we knew it we had met our goal of 800k about 2015. My father in law thought we were nuts to try and retire since he figured he needed several million. Instead of retiring we kept going. Sold the rental houses. I took my retirement job. We have a nice little house that should be resilient to climate change. We past a million. Then a million invested. We blew past lean fire. Now almost 2m invested and I stepped back to full time father and husband. The hard work and sacrifices for a short period of time has now created this life where we can do almost anything I want to do. Thanks for the help and encouragement. It’s totally worth it. It’s real. It works. We live on 50k and the 4 percent rule allows 75k withdrawal.

    I read your thoughts on the election. I don’t disagree. I’m sad because I just don’t see this next administration using science to address issues like climate change. Nor do I see them using compassion to address justice and civil rights. Seems like a powerful person has figured out how to tap into latent sexism and racism and then control those folks through their fear. Its like ST TNG when Lor was able to control Data with the emotion chip by just feeding him fear and anger. We will look back at this time and ask ourselves why we made these poor political choices. Hopefully it works out.

    Just checking in to say hi, I hope you are well!!

    Hit me up if you ever come to the Cleveland area and want to see what we have going on.

    Joel

    Reply
  • Tom LaForce November 16, 2024, 11:01 am

    Any chance you’d consider posting at BlueSky?

    Reply
  • DFlem November 18, 2024, 4:33 am

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 18, 2024, 9:33 am

      Thanks for sharing DFlem – I just went and read that article to see if I could learn from any mistakes.

      Turns out the article is about how the Democrat-fueled second covid-relate spending bill (called “The American Rescue Plan”) helped add to inflation. And I totally agree! As I said in both this article and my more detailed one on inflation, the factors were a combination of decreased supply and increased demand.

      My secondary point which is NOT addressed in that MSN article is that most people don’t seem to understand inflation. They think that the rising prices contribute to a lower standard of living, when in fact most people are better off today than they were in 2019! They just aren’t doing the math on their current salary and asset and home value versus their current total cost of living. You can see several people in the comments making this same incorrect assumption.

      We had a *very* short time of slightly above average inflation, which was still super low inflation compared to what we when through when I was a kid. And now it’s already done. But it has left a definite impact on people’s voting patterns. Which is why I find the human factor of economics so bizarre and fun to study and write about.

      Summary: Inflation does not mean you’re getting poorer!

      Reply
  • Mick November 18, 2024, 12:53 pm

    > “a recent deep analysis from NPR showed that no, grocery stores haven’t made any windfall profit at all off of this recent bout of Covid-fueled inflation.”

    I can’t believe this needs to be said, but … grocery stores don’t set food prices. Those prices are set by manufacturers (and farmers) based on a number of factors.

    Food manufacturers saw record profits in 2023. Pretending that’s unrelated to inflation is laughable.

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 18, 2024, 7:02 pm

      Can you share your sources (and maybe spare us the emotion and sarcasm) so we can actually work together to focus on understanding the data?

      First of all, in a healthy economy I would expect nearly *every* sector of the economy to see “record profits” pretty much every year except in a recession. Because that’s just what happens the world’s largest and most prosperous growing economy.

      Increasing profits aren’t generally the cause of permanent inflation, because a profitable industry attracts more competitors which battle each other until profits are reduced. But inflation does mean that the real value of today’s profits is about 20% less than the same nominal numbers would have been back in 2019.

      Finally, even in the short-term disturbance we’ve just been through, food prices barely went up more than average wages: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jul/26/food-price-inflation-corporate-profit

      Reply
  • Tyler November 19, 2024, 6:36 am

    I agree that for successful people, a president is not going to determine the outcome of their financial success. The US economy is too strong for that.

    The thing that gets me worried is the climate change deniers and their work to actively stop moving to renewable energy. After all, this blog was never really about money and really for the environment, right?

    My area in Western NC was recently devastated by the worst storm to ever hit there and things are only going to get worse from here until we self-correct.

    We don’t ride bikes because they’re cheaper and save money, we do it because it’s efficient and we feel way better doing it than being cooped up inside a gigantic vehicle stuck in traffic. Sure electric cars may be marginally better for the environment than gas ones but we all know the true solution is to design our cities to not be so car-centric and invest in better biking infrastructure and public transportation. At least permanently lower the speed limit with very strict penalties if you’re not going to invest in bike paths. Riding along cars isn’t that dangerous as long as said cars aren’t going that fast.

    Reply
  • Josh November 19, 2024, 11:12 am

    I think you’re wrong about a lot of this, but because I just came across this article the other day, I’ll only mention inflation/real wages/wage growth (or lack thereof).

    I think you’ve probably become a little too sure of things and it comes off as dismissive.

    https://jzmazlish.substack.com/p/yes-inflation-made-the-median-voter?r=naug&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

    Reply
    • Mr. Money Mustache November 20, 2024, 1:55 pm

      GREAT article Josh, thanks for sharing that link!

      That’s exactly the type of stuff I wish we would all send back and forth for consideration when trying to figure out the economy and make our decisions. The details in that economist’s take do indeed help break things down in more detail and taught me quite a few things.

      I still think that people have an incorrect understanding of inflation that is based on price anchoring. You can see it manifesting in several places throughout these comments and Mazlish points this out too in that article. But it’s always great to learn more from analysis like this.

      Reply
  • Roger November 25, 2024, 3:33 am

    I can understand financial bloggers not picking political sides. Why risk angering half your readers?

    But to claim that investors should be indifferent to which politicians are in charge because their policies have no systematic effects on the economy and financial markets is just baffling.

    If there is one strong lesson from economic history it is that policies DO matter, a lot, especially over the long run. Mismanage your economy and you stagnate or worse. Manage it well and you prosper.

    So what are good and bad economic policies?

    History shows free trade and prudent public finances are the best. And protectionism and imprudent spending/borrowing are the worst.

    Pick protectionism and at the extreme you end up like North Korea or Venezuela. Even less extreme versions like Argentina and the Philippines stifle productivity and prosperity and keep citizens poor (apart from the crony capitalists). Whereas free trade encourages your competitive industries, which then export to the world; and penalises your uncompetitive industries, which then need to make way for imports.

    And has no blogger familiarised themselves with the the Smoot-Hawley tariff of the 1930s and the trade war it sparked? World trade went almost literally down the gurgler, which then prolonged the Great Depression.

    https://peltiertech.com/spiraling-down-the-drain/

    So I am astounded that normally thoughtful bloggers just shrug at Trumponomics and say, Nothing to see here. Or worse, say he’ll be a big boost for confidence and profit margins, which will plump our portfolios nicely thank you very much. The man wants to ‘bring manufacturing back’ — a laughable pipedream — and is heedlessly reckless about Uncle Sam’s Aaa/AA+ credit rating.

    Now anyone can argue with my points, but you can’t simply brush Trump’s policies under the carpet, or say he has a magic economic wand.

    Reply
  • S.Y. December 5, 2024, 1:51 am

    The best hedge against the increases in costs and inflationary effects is to get out of super cities if you live in urban boom areas like NY metro, Puget Sound, Los Angeles etc. As MM has pointed out in the past. Small towns offer a lower cost/tax profile with almost the same quality of life experience. Maybe better. My 2c.

    Reply
  • tt December 10, 2024, 9:36 am

    I’ve seen the argument that grocers aren’t gouging elsewhere, now I understand that it’s coming from that NPR analysis. It doesn’t say that grocers aren’t gouging. It just says their profit *rate* has remained pretty steady.

    I’d say the relative increase in groceries vs everything else (inflation), plus the lack of any natural disasters to shorten supply meaningfully (in 2024, obviously COVID was a natural disaster in 2019/2020/2021), the only possible explanation is monopolism — unchecked market power. The Canadian and European grocers got caught and fined for anti-competitive behavior recently. Canada’s grocer monopolists were literally gouging on BREAD!

    The problem in almost all areas is the same: monopoly. We almost wrote prohibitions against market power into the Constitution (one of the founders wrote something along the lines of, “We wouldn’t tolerate a king in politics, why would we in the marketplace?”), but they barely missed the cut. Housing isn’t expensive. It’s the cheapest and highest-quality it’s ever been, and gets cheaper and better quality as time goes on. *Land* is expensive, because land is a monopoly! Groceries — we’ve got Albertson’s and Kroger, a duopoly, trying to merge into a literal monopoly. Food and location are the two most vital things people consume, and both are monopolized in our system. We should change that. Get competition over land and food going. Land ownership should be decided by an ongoing auction for the *privilege* of ownership, not “owned” like regular stuff people make or buy (because people created the value of the latter, but not land). The payment of the highest bid should go to everyone, equally, either locally, or at some greater level, like nationally.

    Reply
  • owDAWG December 12, 2024, 2:09 pm

    Politicians are often masters of optics they can make everything they do look rose colored and everything the “other guy does” look terrible and the media only feeds on that sentiment only for the ratings (we gravitate to the emotional aspect of drama). The reality is one man has very little influence over our day to day lives and with the intractability of Washington (filibuster, etc..) there is only so much our politicians can change on a national level within the confines of laws that have been written over several decades. A lot of the time our day to day lives are heavily influenced by the people we allow into our lives and free market forces. Once you master those 2 forces quality of life and wealth generation becomes a whole lot easier. Need to improve your career outlook or your quality of life then let the right people into your life; there is a big difference between being around people that blame things outside control (high cost of healthcare/the price of food) versus people that take ownership of their health choices and career direction. Markets also play a huge factor in our quality of life choosing to live in an affordable location, investing in index funds over the past 4 years versus buying a new car above MSRP, buying food at Costco vs whole foods, holding off buying consumer goods until there is a sale, traveling in 2021-2022 versus 2023-2024 (or pick a location where the dollar is strong versus the local currency), choosing to pursue a career in a growth-oriented high paying discipline. Understanding how markets work and how to take advantage of them will determine wealth trajectory.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

To keep things non-promotional, please use a real name or nickname
(not Blogger @ My Blog Name)

The most useful comments are those written with the goal of learning from or helping out other readers – after reading the whole article and all the earlier comments. Complaints and insults generally won’t make the cut here, but by all means write them on your own blog!

connect

welcome new readers

Take a look around. If you think you are hardcore enough to handle Maximum Mustache, feel free to start at the first article and read your way up to the present using the links at the bottom of each article.

For more casual sampling, have a look at this complete list of all posts since the beginning of time. Go ahead and click on any titles that intrigue you, and I hope to see you around here more often.

Love, Mr. Money Mustache

latest tweets